Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:17

Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Apple releases new iOS 26 beta 1 build to developers - 9to5Mac
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
From 1 to 10, how dark is the Naruto fandom? Why?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How do you fight the push and pull (manipulation) tactic if you want to win him?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s up in the sky for June 2025? Arietid meteor shower, strawberry moon and much more - WTOP
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
27 Celebrities Before And After Getting Cosmetic Work Done - BuzzFeed
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.